Facebook YouTube Tacklewarehouse.com
Printer-friendly copy Email this topic to a friend
Top Calfishing.com Freshwater Fishing in California topic #15350
View in linear mode

Subject: "The answer is site specific" Previous topic | Next topic
UrbanMon Jul-04-05 08:13 PM
Member since Sep 22nd 2004
402 posts
Click to send email to this author Click to send private message to this authorClick to view this author's profileClick to add this author to your buddy list
#15358, "The answer is site specific"
In response to In response to 0


          

Its impossible to put the same regulation on all lakes and expect to achieve the same results. Many, many variables play a role in determining whether or not catch and release is appropriate in a particular lake. However, the number one factor in determining if a slot (keeping smaller fish) is appropriate for increasing the "quality" of a fishery: recruitment. In general, if recruitment of the first few age classes is very high, keeping and eating those fish will increase the quality in that lake. However, if recruitment in the first few age classes is low, keeping those smaller fish will harm the fishery.

It gets alot more complicated than that but thats a start. For example, what if a lake is loaded with bass under 15 inches, the fish you catch are very fat (no problem with the prey/forage ratio), growth rates of those fish are on par with normal (no stunting), but you almost never see a fish over 15 inches? Hmmm, then whats the problem?

Without a doubt, the number one problem with bass fisheries today is overcrowding, and this is a result of the catch and release craze of the 70's. Most fisheries today can only benefit from keeping sub 12 inch fish. And thats a fact.

  

Alert Printer-friendly copy | Reply | Reply with quote

Wouldnt it be nice.. [View all] , Fishing805Fever, Sat Jul-02-05 08:08 AM
  RE: Wouldnt it be nice.., RIPDLIP, Jul 02nd 2005, #1
RE: Wouldnt it be nice.., Bigreenjobass, Jul 02nd 2005, #2
      RE: Wouldnt it be nice.., BassMan, Jul 02nd 2005, #3
           RE: Wouldnt it be nice.., dockboy, Jul 03rd 2005, #4
                RE: Wouldnt it be nice.., calicokid, Jul 04th 2005, #5
                     RE: Wouldnt it be nice.., Tm Customs, Jul 04th 2005, #6
The answer is site specific, Urban, Jul 04th 2005 #7
RE: The answer is site specific, magmaster, Jul 08th 2005, #8
      RE: The answer is site specific, Upsidedown2983, Aug 15th 2005, #9

Top Calfishing.com Freshwater Fishing in California topic #15350 Previous topic | Next topic
Powered by DCForum+
© Copyright Robert Belloni 1997-2012. All Rights Reserved.
This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed without express written consent.