First off, yes a WON editorial. 2nd, you think these OPINIONS are somewhat insane, then you have a strange & awkward preception of sanity. 3rd, I do agree that everyone using this facility should pay alike. You don't sound like you support the idea of having swimmers. You bring up a safety & security issue regarding injuries caused by boaters. That highlights the need for security patrols then the need for lifeguards. The security should have training in CPR & other life-saving knowledge. Security patrols should replace the lifeguards. Now, if the editorial is correct about the estimated 2.8 million loss per year. Then, it would not take a genius to figure out there needs to be some cut backs somewhere & possibly some increases on fees. Yes, this may include some layoffs! Now, what I don't get is: if a management in charge of managing a lake is losing over a million dollars a year in operation - don't fire them? That management must be RESPONSIBLE, anyways? I guess we should hope the management will figure it out by maybe just raising the fees like more per boat and per car? What they heck, better yet charge each person in the vehicle an enterance fee? That must be the RESPONSIBLE way to go, just keep raising fees til we all get fed up with paying higher prices & stop going there. That must sound SANE & RESPONSIBLE to you, wils. Right?