I'm all for conservation of natural resources. It's just very difficult to tell what the end result of what they are talking about here will mean for fisherman. Does "protection" or waterways equate into no fishing? Certainly in some people's eyes it might. The word "fishing" isn't written once in the proposition so it's kind of a grey area on that. Maybe you guys can shed some light on what you've heard as far as impact to fishing from this proposition.

One thing I think could be a positive is more $$ for buying parks and recreation areas. The quarry ponds are a new park and have made available some good fishing in an urban area. Do they have a lot of lame rules there? You bet, but it's still fishing where there wasn't fishing before.